Dialectics of Types of Legal Regulation Testing from the Perspective of Authority and Effectiveness through the Study of Constitutional Court Decision Number 30/PUU-XVI/2018 and Supreme Court Decision Number 65 P/HUM/2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61166/regulate.v3i1.74Keywords:
Judicial Review, Constitutional Supremacy, Dualism Of Authority, Legal Certainty, Hierarchy Of Norms.Abstract
This article examines the dialectics of judicial review of laws and regulations in Indonesia from the perspective of authority and effectiveness, with a particular focus on the Constitutional Court Decision Number 30/PUU-XVI/2018 and the Supreme Court Decision Number 65 P/HUM/2018. The research aims to analyze the classification and characteristics of judicial review, the mechanisms and institutional authority involved, and the legal implications arising from differences in review models exercised by the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court. This study employs normative legal research using a statutory approach and a case approach. Primary legal materials include the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, statutes governing judicial authority, and relevant court decisions, supported by secondary legal materials from scholarly literature. The analysis is conducted qualitatively through deductive legal reasoning. The findings indicate that the dualism of judicial review authority, while normatively intended to maintain hierarchical order of norms, in practice generates potential disharmony in legal interpretation and weakens legal certainty. Differences in review orientation—constitutional-based review by the Constitutional Court and legal-formal review by the Supreme Court—may result in fragmented implementation of constitutional norms. Therefore, strengthening constitutional supremacy and harmonizing judicial interpretation between both institutions are essential to ensure consistency, effectiveness, and protection of constitutional rights within Indonesia’s legal system.
References
Andhita, D. A., & Adnan, M. (2020). Integrasi Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undangan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 3(2).
Arifin, Z., & Satria, A. P. (2020). Disharmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-. Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik, 9(1), h.4.
As’ad. (2023). Konsepsi Dan Sistem Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Oleh Mahkamah Agung Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Binamulia Hukum, 6(2).
Asshiddiqie, J. (2005). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme. In Konstitusi Press. Konstitusi Press.
Asshiddiqie, J., & Safa’at, M. A. (2016). Teori Hans Kelsen Tentang Hukum. In Mahkamah Konstitusi RI. Sekretariat Jenderal dan Kepaniteraan Mahkamah Konstitusi RI.
Aziz, M. (2016). Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan dalam Sistem Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 7(5), 113. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk756
Fudika, M. D. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Pengujian Formil Undang-Undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi. UIR Law Review, 6(1).
Helmi, M. I. (2019). Penyelesaian Satu Atap Perkara Judicial Review di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Salam: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-i, 6(1).
Huda, N. (2005). Negara Hukum, Demokrasi dan Judicial Review. UII Press.
Indrati, M. F. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-undangan. Penerbit Kanisius.
Laksono, F. (2019). Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Hukum Acara Pengujian UU Terhadap UUD 1945. Pusat Pendidikan Pancasila dan Konstitusi MKRI.
Maha Putra, E. A. (2024). Konsep Ideal Pengujian Peraturan Kebijakan (Beleidsregel) Di Indonesia. Wijaya Putra Law Review, 3(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.38156/wplr.v3i1.179
Mochtar, Z. A., & Hiariej, eddy O. S. (2021). Dasar-dasar Ilmu Hukum: Memahami Kaidah, teori, Asas dan Filsafat Hukum. Perpustakaan Nasional: Katalog dalam Terbitan.
Mochtar, Z. A., & Suprapto. (2021). Asas Terbuka untuk Umum dalam Persidangan Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Bawah Undang-Undang oleh Mahkamah Agung. Badamai Law Journal, 6(2).
Putra, A. (2018). Dualisme Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-undangan. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 15(2).
Saragih, G. M., Nasution, M., & Sihombing, E. N. (2025). Judicial Review Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint dalam Perspektif Kebebasan Kehakiman. Jurnal Konstitusi, 22(1), 039–065. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2213
Sudirman, Kondolayuk, M. L., & Cahaya, I. M. E. (2023). Metodologi Penelitian 1 : Deskriptif Kuantitatif (Issue July). Media Sains Indonesia.
Suparto. (2021). Problematika Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Mahkamah Agung (Kajian terhadap Putusan MA No. 65 P/HUM/2018). SASI, 27(1).
Suprayoga, T., & Suwito, S. (2024). Kewenangan Pengujian Peraturan Daerah Dalam Perspektif Undang-Undang. Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Multidisiplin (JURKIM), 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.31849/jurkim.v4i1.15739
Utami, T., Solihah, S., Maulana, M., Adawiah, I., & Firdaus, M. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Penerap Prinsip Legalitas Dalam Peraturan Perundang Undangan di Indonesia. Journal Customary Law, 2(3), 10. https://doi.org/10.47134/jcl.v2i3.4048
Yunaldi, W. (2018). Konsepsi Dan Sistem Pengujian Peraturan Perundang-Undangan Oleh Mahkamah Agung Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 1(2).
Zamroni Faizal Abdi, & Chintya Khaerunnisa. (2024). Revitalization of Supervision of the Judicial Commission as Strengthening Judicial Institutions in Maintaining the Independence and Integrity of Judges. JUSTICES: Journal of Law, 3(3), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.58355/justices.v3i3.110
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Naufal Nuryasir Hibaatullah, Nurul ‘Izzul Umami, Reyhana Luthfiyah Sari, Vironika Dewi, Utang Rosidin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
