The Application of Police Discretion in Handling Anarchic Demonstrations: Challenges and Law Enforcement Strategies

Rodhotun Nimah

doi:10.61166/regulate.v3i3.82

Authors

Rodhotun Nimah Universitas Boyolali

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61166/regulate.v3i3.82

Keywords:

Police Discretion, Anarchic Demonstrations, Law Enforcement, Police Discretion, Anarchic Demonstrations, Law Enforcement, Human Rights, Police Strategies., Police Strategies

Abstract

Demonstrations are one of the forms of expressing opinions in public that are guaranteed within a democratic system. However, in practice, some demonstrations may escalate into anarchic acts that disrupt public order, damage public facilities, and pose threats to public safety. Under such circumstances, the police have discretionary authority to make decisions based on the situations and conditions in the field in order to maintain a balance between protecting the public's right to express opinions and enforcing the law. This study aims to analyze the implementation of police discretion in handling anarchic demonstrations, identify various challenges faced by police officers, and examine law enforcement strategies that can be implemented effectively and humanely. The research method employed is normative juridical research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results indicate that the implementation of police discretion plays an important role in determining appropriate measures for handling anarchic demonstrations, particularly in preventing conflict escalation and maintaining security and stability. However, the exercise of discretion faces various challenges, including the dilemma between taking firm action and respecting human rights, public pressure, limited information in the field, and the potential abuse of authority. Therefore, law enforcement strategies are needed that prioritize the principles of proportionality, professionalism, persuasive communication, and oversight of the exercise of discretionary authority. Through the proper implementation of discretion, the police are expected to achieve law enforcement that is effective and just while continuing to uphold democratic values.

References

Ahmad, Ibrahim. "Rencana dan Strategi Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat." Gorontalo Law Review (2018): 15-24.

Al Adawiah, Rabiah. "Pendekatan kepolisian dalam menanggulangi kekerasan terhadap anak di era digital." Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Kepolisian dan Anti Korupsi 1, no. 2 (2024): 77-92.

Adnyani, Ni Ketut Sari. “Kewenangan Diskresi Kepolisian Republik Indonesia Dalam Penegakan Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Sosial 7, no. 2 (2021): 135. https://doi.org/10.23887/jiis.v7i2.37389.

Ansori, Lutfil. “Diskresi Dan Pertanggungjawaban Pemerintah Dalam Penyelenggaraan Pemerintahan.” Jurnal Yuridis 2, no. 1 (2015): 134–50.

Anwar, Rinaldi putra. “Jurnal Magister Hukum ‘Law and Humanity’” 1, no. 2 (2023): 295.

“BAB III Metode Penelitian, Skripsi Universitas Metro Lampung.,” n.d., 52–53. Balipost. “Gelombang Demonstrasi Meluas, Ini Deretan Daerah Di Indonesia

Butar, Ricko Samuel D Butar, H. Sudi Fahmi, and Ardiansah. “MELANGGAR HUKUM DI KOTA PEKANBARU BERDASARKAN KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA” 12, no. 3 (2025): 90–100.

Detikcom. “Demo Buruh Di Semarang Ricuh, Belasan Orang Diamankan,” n.d. https://www.detik.com/jateng/berita/d-7895239/demo-buruh-di-semarang-ricuh-belasan-orang-diamankan.

———. “Sejarah Korps Brimob Polri Dan Struktur Organisasinya,” n.d. https://www.detik.com/kalimantan/berita/d-8210362/sejarah-korps-brimob-polri-dan-struktur-organisasinya%0A.

Doni, Hafendi, and Silalahi Wilma. “Rewang Rencang : Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis. Vol.5. No.12 (2025) Tema/Edisi : Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia

(Bulan Kedua Belas) Https://Jhlg.Rewangrencang.Com/” 5, no. 12 (2025): 1–27.

Faculty, Hazim. “The Role of the Mobile Brigade Unit in Eradicating Terrorism Crimes” 3, no. 1 (2024): 1152–62.

Goldsmith, Stephen, and Juncheng Yang. “AI and the Transformation of Accountability and Discretion in Urban Governance,” no. July 2025 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2026.02.005.

Hari Susanto, Sri Nur. “Metode Perolehan Dan Batas-Batas Wewenang Pemerintahan.” Administrative Law & Governance Journal 3, no. 3 (2020): 430–41.

Hartanto, Abdillah Yoga Setya, Hartoyo, and Subekti. “PERTANGGUNG JAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU UNJUK RASA ANARKIS,” 2025.

Hukum Online. “UU No 2 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia,” n.d. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/uu-no-2-tahun-2002-tentang-kepolisian-negara-republik-indonesia-hol5008?page=all.

Hulu, Info Kapuas. “Mengenal Unit Pasukan Dalmas Sat Pol PP,” n.d. https://info.kapuashulukab.go.id/2021/03/02/mengenal-unit-pasukan-dalmas-sat-pol-pp/.

Ifakta.co. “Massa Anarkis Ricuh Di Depan Mapolda Jateng, Mobil Dibakar Di Kantor Gubernur,” n.d.

Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Pasal 18 ayat (1) (2002). https://www.catatanhukum.com/DOC-PUU/UU_No_2_Tahun_2002-Kepolisian_RI/index.html.

——. Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 1998 tentang Kemerdekaan Menyampaikan Pendapat di Muka Umum (n.d.).

Iswan, Muhamad, Danu Suryani, and Muhammad Aminulloh. “Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 16 Tahun 2006 Tentang Pedoman Pengendalian Massa Dalam Pengamanan Unjuk Rasa Oleh Korps Brimob.” Karimah Tauhid 3, no. 6 (2024): 6761–72. https://doi.org/10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i6.13781.

Kompas.com. “Apa Itu Brimob? Ini Tugas Dan Perannya,” n.d. https://www.kompas.com/skola/read/2025/09/03/190000569/apa-itu-brimob-ini-tugas-dan-perannya.